Drug Driving

DRIVING WITH ILLICIT DRUG IN BLOOD, ORAL FLUID OR URINE

Section 111 Road Transport Act 2013 creates the offence of driving with illicit drug in oral fluid, blood or urine and states:

A person must not, while there is present in the person’s oral fluid, blood, or urine any prescribed illicit drug:

  • drive a motor vehicle, or
  • occupy the driving seat of a motor vehicle and attempt to put the motor vehicle in motion, or
  • if the person is the holder of an applicable driver licence (other than an applicable provisional licence or applicable learner licence)–occupy the seat in a motor vehicle next to a learner driver who is driving the vehicle.

Maximum penalty: Fine of $2,200 (in the case of a first offence) or $3,300 (in the case of a second or subsequent offence).

Prescribed illicit drug means any of the following:

  • delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (also known as THC),
  • methylamphetamine (also known as speed),
  • 3,4-methylenedioxymethylamphetamine (also known as ecstasy), and
  • cocaine.

A person must not, while there is present in the person’s blood or urine any morphine:

  • drive a motor vehicle, or
  • occupy the driving seat of a motor vehicle and attempt to put the motor vehicle in motion, or
  • if the person is the holder of an applicable driver licence (other than an applicable provisional licence or applicable learner licence)–occupy the seat in a motor vehicle next to a learner driver who is driving the vehicle.

Maximum penalty: Fine of $2,200 (in the case of a first offence) or $3,300 (in the case of a second or subsequent offence).

Elect the Penalty notice for determination before a Court and either:

  • Plead not guilty and have the matter heard before the Court noting that the Prosecution do not need to prove that you were impaired by the presence of the prescribed illicit drug while driving but that you had a prescribed illicit drug in your in oral fluid, blood or urine, or
  • Plead guilty and seek leniency from the Court by seeking that the Court deal with the matter via a non-conviction order.

When the Courts consider dealing with the offender via a non-conviction, the Court look at:

  • The person’s character, antecedents, age, health and mental condition,
  • The trivial nature of the offence,
  • The extenuating circumstances in which the offence was committed,
  • Any other matter that the court thinks proper to consider.

For a consultation with a Traffic Lawyer, call AMA Legal on (02) 8610 3764.

Apprehended Violence Orders

REVIEWS

I highly recommend this people.. Specially Ahmed Shakeri.. He explained your rights and battle your situation in a legal way.. Thanks mate..
Appreciate you've done..

Jerry Casipit

Can not recommend Ahmed Shakeri enough. He puts in 100% effort and makes sure you get the best outcome possible. Thank you again for your outstanding service!

Joshua Davis

Request a call back from a Senior Lawyer